Preschool for all

As a father of three boys, get alongs four, two, and about recently, a two month old, I redeem been Interested ab come to the fore the breeding options available for them. It was not until I attempted to conduct my own research on the early childhood education, specifically pre school day for my oldest son, then three historic period old, did I realize the difficulty In doing so. Having been a member of The joined provinces Air disembowel, I was afforded the opportunity to enroll my children into the robust, yet nearly dates frustrating, peasant Development Center that is established on each Air Force base.Living in a world of checklists and constant inspections, I did not mystify virtually the quality of the weapons platform. As I transiti cardinald to be a civilian, my motion began to swim at what is considered high quality education for my growing boys. I sentiment that I knew astir(predicate) preschools, it seemed like common sense to me. by and by the first fe w classroom discussions into our exploratory research papers, the all overarching topic for my faller students was Twenty First Century Families. I knew that my recent struggle would aspect perfectly. haveing with only a question and without a clue, I set out to find out why here were not any low-cost options for high quality preschools. The Investigation began with a conversation with my wife about the topic. She re noused me that chair Obama spoke about this very topic In the 2013 State of the union Address. In a speech that took just over an hour, president Beams address to the nation set forth many challenges for sexual intercourse as well as the citizens of The united States of America. One challenge in particular came about half way through the speech.Obama noted that although the alternate and collegiate education is something that should be pursed, the education of our youngest citizens would not e handle by his administration. He goes on to state, Every dollar we i nvest in high- quality early childhood education can save to a greater extent than seven dollars later on by boosting graduation rates, reducing teenager pregnancy, even reducing violent crime (Remarks). I fully foul this Initiative by the chairman. It seems easy for law mystifyrs to get wrapped up In meeting the demands for their constituents, but what about the youngest constituents?It did not take me prospicient to realize that what I thought I knew about the subject was about to get more complicated. However, for the future of my three boys, I looked deeper into the make do. To my surprise, President Obama brought up the same topic in the 2014 State of the Union Address. buried about one third of the way into the speech, President Obama transitioned into the early childhood education topic yet again. At first, I thought to myself, If he cannot push this forward, this issue must run even deeper than I thought. President Obama explains that the best investment in young childs life is one of a high-quality education.As he brought the topic to a close in his speech, President Obama states that despite Congress stalling, thirty states have raised pre-K funding on their own (President). He added, As Congress decides what Its spillage to do, Im going to pull together a coalition of elected officials, business leaders, and philanthropists volition to help more kids access the high-quality pre-K they need (President). This put me at ease, but I was convinced that President there were going to be several political gains to be made if each state were to issue forth through with their block up of the bargain.Although it seemed like a strong use of taxpayer funds, I was not convinced that the expenditure was worth it. While I put away support his proposal, I felt there were more layers to the onion that require to be led back. I nevertheless did not have an service as to why there were not any affordable preschools that I considered to be high quality. Whi le I was sifting through scads of abstracts through the Academic Search Complete database, there was one in particular that caught my eye from the Congressional Digest, entitled Early Childhood grooming.As the third source for my exploratory research paper, this article shed some light on the history of the Universal Preschool debate. The origins of the universal preschool debate began in 1965 with President Lyndon B. Johnnys indicate first program. This eight-week summer course was aimed at low-income families with children in the kindergarten age group. It did not take long for this program to become habitual both as a political topic, but also as a tool for social change. The program came at a time in America that was plagued by the war in Vietnam.Head Start grew in size over the next 40 years. Today, there are xlv divergent Federal programs that provide assistance and services to families with children under the age of five. However, there is still a long-standing debate o ver the continuing achievement in terms of supportive services and curriculum for children ender the age of five. there is, however, no standing debate to the powerful remarks made by President Johnson in 1965 regarding the newly developed Head Start program, Children are inheritors of povertys avow and not its creators.Unless we act, these children will pass it on to the next generation (CTD. In Early). My thought process began to shift a little. While I did have it away that the Head Start program existed, I did not know that it was so closely related to preschool age children. In my experience, the Head Start program was intended for those with difficulties adapting or learning in a public school setting. Still, I peeled back another layer from this debate. Using the husking that a large number of separate Federal programs are involved with assisting families, I sought out a source from the opposite end of the debate.The forth source I selected to help me understand the deb ate of Preschool for only was from the National Affairs Journal. David Armor and Sonic Souse wrote the article, The Dubious forebode of Universal Preschool. Both authors are professors at the School of Public insurance policy at George Mason University. I read the article with an open mind already knowing the opposing conservative lean on the Journal. David participation and Sonic Souse recapped a brief history of the debate, also mentioning President Johnnys initial Head Start proposal in 1965. But they pronto moved on to statistics and interpreting surveys that had been conducted.I found myself taking notes as I learned about the rapid growth in the asses of the Head Start program that ballooned from 400,000 in the asses to nearly 900,000 children (Armor Souse 37). The authors soon dive into concerns over the quality of the program, citing again the forty-five different Federal programs that support Head Start. They further explain hat the locally developed curriculums are o ft pointed out as the weakness in the overall program (Armor Souse). Additionally, most Head Start teachers do not background in childhood education with an associates degree (Armor Souse, 39).I was taken back by this discovery. The quality of focusing seemed to be directly related to the experience of its instructor. The history of the Head Start Program is indeed a remarkable one. As one of the all-night running Federal Government programs that attacks one of the poverty issues that exist in our country, Head Start surely has its merits and drawbacks. The idea of Preschool for All started from a little attempt to help low-income families with small children prepare for kindergarten. It later grew into the national debate we see and participate in today.Knowing that there were indeed instances where states have had undimmed success, I aimed my focus at the state of okay. According to an article I found in The New York Times using the database tool Lexiss, Oklahoma Where the Ki ds Learn Early, two time Pulitzer Prize winning author Nicholas Kristin depicts a story about two young girls, ages three and four aiming to join the cycle of poverty which is about so much more than a lack of money (Krzysztof. The girls great naan had a baby at 13, their grandmother followed with a baby at 15, the mom had her first baby by 13, born with drugs in his system (Krzysztof.I was shocked as I hold in reading. The inequality of these innocent children Jumped out at me. Suddenly, the debate took a different shape. In an interview that the author conducted with Republican Tulsa City Council member leave out Steele, This isnt a liberal issue, he added, this is investing in our kids, in our future. Its a no- brainier (Krzysztof. While I had researched nearly a dozen sources and discussed several of them here, no(prenominal) put the face to the story quite like this article. It is a cutting reminder that there is a face behind all the numbers, figures, and charts that mak e up statistics.The exploratory paper I began soon did not observe like an assignment anymore. It seemed like I was apart of a faeces for the future of our nation. After conducting the research and having time to analyze the information, I still feel that Preschool for All is absolutely the right thing to do. With its earnest beginnings during the Vietnam War, to the subdue town of Tulsa, Oklahoma, my Rooney throughout this exploratory paper was very interesting. I was impress to find out that about the number of Federal government programs that have oversight in the Head Start program.